“Not paying a just wage, not providing work, focusing exclusively on the balance books, on financial statements, only looking at making profit…That goes against God!”
AFL-CIO Offer Immigration Resources
The following resources are intended help ensure that members of our unions know their rights and are prepared to defend themselves and the immigrant members of their families and their communities in the event of workplace or community raids:
- The National Immigration Law Center (NILC) offers detailed information about your rights and links to low-cost and free legal assistance.
- This American Federation of Teachers (AFT) Guide for Educators includes advice on how to support and protect immigrant youth and families in case of a raid.
- This guidance from the Immigration Legal Resource Center (ILRC) explains steps immigrant families should take before and during a raid.
The following organizations have useful materials to support, protect and empower immigrant working people:
The Administrative Relief Resource Center is a project of the Committee For Immigration Reform Implementation.
Asian American Justice Center is the only national legal advocacy organization that works to protect and advance the civil rights of Asian Pacific Americans.
Asian Pacific American Labor Alliance is the first and only national organization of Asian American and Pacific Islander workers, most of who are union members, and allies advancing worker, immigrant and civil rights.
Centro de los Derechos del Migrante, Inc. uses education, outreach and leadership development; intake, evaluation and referral services; litigation support and direct representation; and policy advocacy to defend and protect the rights of workers as they move between their home communities in Mexico and their workplaces in the United States.
Farmworker Justice empowers migrant and seasonal farmworkers to improve their living and working conditions.
The International Labor Recruitment Working Group seeks to end the systemic abuse of international workers who are recruited to the U.S., by collaborating across labor sectors to develop comprehensive policies and advocate for reforms.
Labor Council for Latin American Advancement is a national organization representing the interests of approximately 2 million Latino/a trade unionist throughout the United States and Puerto Rico.
Mijente is a hub for social justice organizing that is pro-Latinx, but pro-Black, pro-woman, pro-queer, and pro-poor.
National Council of La Raza is the nation’s largest constituency-based Hispanic organization that works to reduce poverty and discrimination, and improve life opportunities for all Hispanic Americans.
National Day Laborers Organizing Network improves the lives of day laborers in the United States and helps member organizations develop leadership, mobilize and organize day laborers in order to protect and expand their civil, labor and human rights.
The National Domestic Workers Alliance is the nation’s leading voice for dignity and fairness for the millions of domestic workers in the United States, most of whom are women.
National Employment Law Project is a national advocacy organization for employment rights of lower-wage and immigrant workers.
National Immigration Law Center engages in policy analysis, litigation, education and advocacy for racial, economic and social justice for low-income immigrants.
The National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers’ Guild provides legal and technical support to immigrant communities, legal practitioners and all advocates seeking to advance the rights of non-citizens.
#Not1More builds collaboration between individuals, organizations, artists, and allies to expose, confront, and overcome unjust immigration laws.
United We Dream is a national immigrant youth-led organization whose mission is to achieve equal access to higher education for all people, regardless of immigration status.
Kentucky Bishop on Right to Work: “This cannot be seen as contributing to the common good”
Last month in this space I wrote about anti-union “right-to-work” legislation circulating in three states — Kentucky, Missouri and New Hampshire. As the legislation hit the floor in Kentucky, Bishop John Stowe of Lexington issued a remarkable appeal to state legislators defending Catholic social teaching on labor and worker justice, and indicating how that teaching illuminated the issue before them. Although legislators in the Bluegrass State pushed the bill through anyway, this issue is still under debate in MO and NH, and some union opponents hope to bring it to the US Congress. The message is recommended reading for Catholics, lay and clergy, who want to understand this issue:
Kentucky House Bill 1
As the Roman Catholic Bishop of the Diocese of Lexington, I represent a Church community with a long tradition of social teaching. Our social doctrine is a means of applying the principles of our Christian faith to the better ordering of society. Social teaching is rooted in the Judeo-Christian Scriptures and the Tradition of passing on that faith and its principles through 2,000 years. When we address the public good, and engage in the democratic process, it is with the intention of promoting common good, that is, the well-being of all people. We speak to the moral dimension of public issues and are always mindful of the effects of laws and decisions on the most vulnerable members of the population. When we address economic issues, it is from the perspective that economy is not an end in itself, but is to serve people and help them to flourish. The good of the human person is at the center of all economic activities.
The dignity of work and the rights of workers are critical to our approach to economic issues and laws. Workers cannot be treated merely as a means for corporate profit and production, but must be seen as autonomous human beings who contribute to the common good through their work. Modern Catholic Social teaching began in 1897 with Pope Leo XIII’s encyclical Rerum Novarum which emphasizes the dignity and rights of workers, and in particular affirms the rights of workers to organize for the protection of their just rights. Among those rights are the right to decent wages and safe-working conditions. In Catholic teaching, unions are described as an indispensable element of social life. Unions are to promote solidarity among workers. They are essential for economic justice and to protect the rights of workers.
It follows from the strong support of organized labor for the common good, that unions need the support of the workers they represent. The falsely named “right to work” legislation proposed does not in fact create new rights to work, but rather strives to limit the effectiveness and power of the unions. When all workers benefit from the negotiations of the labor unions, through better wages and conditions, it is only just that the workers should participate by paying dues to the union which represents them in the workplace.
The weakening of unions by so-called “right to work” laws, has been shown to reduce wages and benefits overall in the states where such laws have been enacted. This cannot be seen as contributing to the common good. I implore Kentucky legislators, at this new moment in the state’s history, to consider the well-being of working men and women in the state and to realize that stronger labor unions lead to more fair negotiations which benefit all workers in the state.
Most Reverend John Stowe, OFM Conv.
Catholic Bishop of Lexington
4 January 2017
Thank you, Bishop Stowe, for your thoughtful testimony!
Conference examines clash between US culture, Catholic social teaching
Julie Bourbon, Jan. 17, 2017, National Catholic Reporter
In this time of transition — Barack Obama saying farewell to the presidency as Donald Trump moves into that job, Republicans flexing their muscles as the dominant political party — Catholic leaders, including an advisor to the pope, gathered with academics and labor leaders in mid-January to step back from that flurry of activity to think about economics and workers’ rights from the perspective of Catholic social teaching.On Jan. 10, a lineup of speakers addressed libertarianism and the dominant American culture of runaway consumerism at “Erroneous Autonomy: The Dignity of Work,” the third in a series of conferences sponsored by the Institute for Policy Research & Catholic Studies at Catholic University in Washington, in partnership with the AFL-CIO.Stephen Schneck, director of the institute, began by recalling Pope Pius XI’s 1931 encyclical, Quadragesimo Anno, when the term “erroneous autonomy” was first used to convey “the Catholic church’s concern that systems of untethered, competing individual choices — like markets, and not just economic markets — can lead to outcomes that are contrary to morality and contrary to the common good.”
Speakers covered a range of topics, including the way health care, even Catholic health care, is now treated as a commodity, which distorts its mission; consumerism and family life; a moral take on capitalism and the environment; international development and the dignity of work in the developing world; and a grim picture of capitalism, governance, and the new Congress and administration.
Bishop Robert McElroy of San Diego and Cardinal Sean O’Malley of Boston — the sole American on Pope Francis’ Council of Cardinals — bookended the afternoon, speaking on three kinds of erroneous autonomy and hope for the dignity of labor, respectively.
McElroy’s remarks, reprinted in full here, focused on the incompatibility of Catholic social teaching with what he calls the three “framing forces” of American political and social life: the drive for the sovereignty of markets, the technocratic paradigm (dominance over the environment and culture), and nationalism (make America great again!).
“If love of country is a virtue and a moral obligation in solidarity, the nationalistic impulse itself has no moral identity,” McElroy said. He proposed three questions for Americans in the coming months: Who are “the people” in the United States? What does greatness mean for the United States? And does nationalism concern itself only with the interests of the United States, or is it fundamentally connected with our obligations to the international common good?
Those questions served as a kind of framing force for the day’s talks.
Daughter of Charity Sr. Carol Keehan, president of the Catholic Health Association of the United States, remarked that many religious congregations were founded expressly to take care of the poor and the sick — that Jesus himself cared for the sick — yet health care companies are now major players on the stock market and legislation is crafted not with the health of the many in mind, but rather to appease drug companies and the insurance industry.
“Neither the individual nor the common good is being valued in this race to repeal” the Affordable Care Act, Keehan said, calling Congress’ willingness to take away coverage from the more than 20 million people who now have it “irresponsible,” “callous,” and “something we must find intolerable.”
“The tyranny and worship of the marketplace is deeply felt in health care.”
After health care came a look at the impact of consumerism on family life by Holly Taylor Coolman, professor of theology at Providence College. She zeroed in on the widening socioeconomic gap between the richest and poorest in the United States, as not just income inequality but wealth inequality continue to grow exponentially.
A spirit of “competitive individualism” has gripped many American families, both rich and poor, she said, with different goals but similarly damaging effects. Wealthier families increasingly exist in a state of “busyness,” with “grooming children for success” their primary reason for being. “People are being formed for one reality: success in the marketplace,” she said. They might be working in cooperation, but the goal is ultimately a competitive one.
Poor families are simply focused on survival, Coolman said, as the challenges of economic necessity “deplete family members and the whole family system.” We need look no further for evidence of this stress on families of every stripe than the loss of the practice of sharing meals together, as “eating dinner now presents itself as a virtually insoluble problem.”
A take on consumer capitalism and the environment, by David Cloutier, professor of theology at Catholic University, followed. Citing the problem of unlimited consumption as an example of erroneous autonomy, Cloutier called for “conscientious moral stewardship” that does not entail simply giving away all of your belongings but rather more thoughtful lifestyle choices in keeping with the universal destination of goods or sharing of God’s gifts — impact investing, seeking out fairly traded goods, buying from workers who were paid a fair wage.
“Where is the just wage tag on my clothes?” he asked. “We should demand to see these things, but all we see is the price tag.”
Joan Rosenhauer, executive vice president of Catholic Relief Services, offered stories of hope from the developing world, where CRS works. From teaching basic financial education to the most marginalized in Africa (allowing people to feed and educate their families), to teaching social and negotiation skills to young people in Latin America so that they can sidestep gang recruitment, to fighting human trafficking, CRS programs are shaping economic life by harnessing private capital for social impact, she said.
“Justice is the floor below which we cannot allow people to drop,” she said. “Charity is what goes up and above that.”
Rosenhauer’s stories of uplift were followed by something a little more sobering, as Thomas Frank, author of What’s the Matter with Kansas and, more recently, Listen Liberal, offered a critical assessment of the Obama years and the Trump rebellion. He cited the Democratic Party’s long shift away from the workingman; it has, instead, fashioned itself “into the tribune of the enlightened professional class, a ‘creative class’ that makes innovative things like derivative securities and smartphone apps.”
We are witnessing America as it “clambers further down into the sulfurous pit called utopia,” he said, “down into the seething Arcadia of all against all.”
O’Malley offered reflections on his experiences with organized labor and the papal tradition of calling “for equity, for fairness in our understanding of what constitutes a just economy and the role of workers.” The text of the cardinal’s talk is here.
Richard Trumka, president of the AFL-CIO, closed the conference with a commitment by organized labor to stand with immigrants and their right to remain and work in the United States.
“What Trump proposes tears at our values, and we will resist it and refuse to be divided into us versus them,” he said. “Pope Francis has called on Catholics to be a true sanctuary. The next few years will define who and what we really are, as a labor movement and as a church. Will we stand true to our moral values when it could really cost us something? We will be tested.”
Although Trump’s name was not mentioned too often, his presence was felt, particularly in post-conference conversations. When asked how thoughtful people might conduct themselves over the next four years, Cloutier said, “It’s kind of organize or die at this point. There has to be a decisive coming to grips with what you stand for.”
A fourth conference is being planned for spring 2018, said Schneck. Speakers at that gathering “will consider how erroneous autonomy undercuts the church’s moral teachings, in the way that faceless markets foment moral relativism and erode genuine personhood by detaching the person from community,” he said.